Current time: 23-08-2014, 07:04 AM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Heuristics and Biases - A talk
Author Message
Lije Offline
Administrator

Posts: 686
Likes Given: 256
Likes Received: 335 in 187 posts
Joined: Mar 2010


Post: #1
Heuristics and Biases - A talk

An interesting talk about conjunction fallacy, occams razor, computational basis for deciding what is simple and what is not, hindsight bias, utility of a theory lies in what it cannot predict.

[+] 1 user Likes Lije's post
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
arvindiyer Offline
Veteran of Freethought
****

Posts: 622
Likes Given: 164
Likes Received: 572 in 303 posts
Joined: Oct 2010


Post: #2
RE: Heuristics and Biases - A talk

Related aside: This BBC Horizon documentary surveys some of the biases which human decision-making is prone to (eg. priming, probability distortions as described by Prospect Theory, tendency for post hoc rationalization) and some methods to aid better decision-making (eg. overcoming indecision by 'externalizing') illustrated in decision-making settings such as dating and shopping.





It is an interesting watch in a 'pop-sciencey' way, except for the inclusion of a section on precognition as claimed by the Institute of Noetic Sciences, controversial claims which according to the mainstream scientific community are themselves a study in biases.
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2012 12:07 PM by arvindiyer.)
[+] 1 user Likes arvindiyer's post
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
arvindiyer Offline
Veteran of Freethought
****

Posts: 622
Likes Given: 164
Likes Received: 572 in 303 posts
Joined: Oct 2010


Post: #3
RE: Heuristics and Biases - A talk

(10-03-2012 11:47 AM)arvindiyer Wrote:  It is an interesting watch in a 'pop-sciencey' way, except for the inclusion of a section on precognition as claimed by the Institute of Noetic Sciences, controversial claims which according to the mainstream scientific community are themselves a study in biases.

Here is a recent article on the whyevolutionistrue blog, reporting a new study that failed to replicate the previously reported findings about 'precognition'.

Tests of the supernatural fail again: new study can’t replicate findings of precognition
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)